Around the 4th of July several years ago, my husband and I were out walking in a new development where homes were popping up right next to several charming storefronts. We saw fireworks in the distance and walked closer to take a look. Several families were gathered, providing a show with aerial fireworks. The setting was dreamlike—perfect weather in a shiny new neighborhood glowing with an idealistic, quasi-Seussian quality.
The mood shifted entirely when one of the aerial fireworks fell over, shooting into the open garage where the rest of the fireworks were stored. My husband and I both felt sick as we watched a chain reaction of igniting fireworks which quickly started a larger fire. In under a few minutes, the entire garage was in flames threatening to engulf the whole house.
There’s no question that fireworks come with risk. The potential injury to body and environment is exactly why they must be managed so carefully. However, despite the risk, they are still a common part of many festivities, because in general the celebratory aspects outweigh the risk.
In a way, this is a metaphor for marital conflict. Too many fireworks can ignite a marriage into aggressive and destructive conflict. However, there can be such a thing as too few fireworks, which doesn’t just leave the marriage dull but potentially harmful in a different way.
In graduate school, one of the first things we were taught is that we had to worry more about the couples who weren’t having any conflict than about the couples that were having some conflict. The absence of conflict is too often indicative of too much distance in a marriage, or an imbalance of one partner continually sacrificing individual desires for the other partner.
It’s so important to realize that if you are married to a partner who has a “peace at any price,” mentality, this is high risk for negative elements to creep into the marriage. It’s easy to pick up on this dynamic in therapy. One partner will start complaining that the other partner isn’t complying with a rigid set of rules for something, and when the other partner begins to state why he/she doesn’t think it should be such a big deal, the louder partner gets more upset and emotional and the other partner backs off and goes quiet and gives up trying to protest.
Partners who require compliance from their spouses unfortunately don’t even realize that they are creating damage, because their partners aren’t saying enough, if anything, about it. When one partner is allowing a continual boundary violation, it’s bad for the marriage. Over time, here’s what happens.
- Resentment builds in the quieter partner, but it’s not worth risking conflict to talk about it, so it continues to grow.
- The partner who gives in all the time is more likely to hide behavior from the other partner to avoid facing conflict.
- Overall trust in the relationship diminishes because the louder partner never quite knows what’s going on with the other partner, so the dynamic generates suspicion, which generates more control, and the cycle repeats, pushing the quieter partner away.
- The quieter partner is more likely to turn away to connect to someone or something else because the louder, more demanding partner feels too risky to connect with—there’s a continual feeling of conditional acceptance, i.e., “You will only love me if I do what you want.”
No one wants to be parented by a spouse. Be aware that if you have a partner who gives in all the time, and you never have conflict, you might be creating resentment without even realizing it. I see this happen over and over and over—and it can take decades before the quieter partner finally can’t take it anymore and disconnects from the relationship completely.
Couples who live together in close emotional proximity are going to step on each other’s toes. It’s highly unlikely to be able to get close to someone without conflict. Conflict can help you know your other partner better and can provide the possibility for negotiation. It puts the relationship on center stage rather than the desires of one partner. Think of it like sandpaper, smoothing away rough edges for a better fit and finish.
Years ago, a friend of mine who overheard a marital spat between my husband and me declared self-righteously that she would “not have any arguing,” in her home because it was just unacceptable. I felt terrible for days afterward until my husband and I went out with her and her husband. All night long I observed that anything she told him to do, he did without protest, and she had a long list of rigid demands. She monitored what he wore, what he ate, and how he behaved in social settings.
I never cease to be amazed by wives who think it’s their job to manage their husbands so carefully. I just did not grow up with that kind of control, and as a therapist, I view it as very unhealthy and intrusive. A spouse is a separate, unique individual–not an idealized extension of oneself.
When we got home, I whined to my husband, “It’s not fair—it’s easy for her to not have conflict in her house because her husband just does everything she says. She’s ten times bossier than I am, but you’re not compliant like her husband—if I had a husband like that, I wouldn’t have conflict in my home either.” “Do you want a husband like that?” my husband asked. “No! Boyfriend needs to get a backbone!” I exclaimed. “Exactly,” he agreed.
About 15 years later, that couple got divorced. The husband got tired of not having a voice and by the time he let his wife know, all his feelings for her were coated with resentment and he was unwilling to work on the marriage. Any variation of, “my way or the highway,” comes with risk of slowly destroying interpersonal relationships. High control can be a lot more problematic than people realize.
This is a co-created dynamic. The partner who doesn’t set boundaries to avoid conflict is as much at fault as the partner with the demands, because failure to communicate is unspoken agreement. It’s easy to blame the more demanding partner, but the placating partner has as much to do with keeping the negative pattern going.
Evaluate your marriage. If you are always getting your way, there is something seriously wrong. If you are always giving in, you’re hurting your marriage.
I’m not promoting contention. High levels of conflict can be as much or more damaging. I’m merely encouraging the acceptance of normative conflict in close relationships and suggesting that it can provide some value for eventual intimacy.
In short, be willing to risk a few sparklers now to prevent an M-80 of resentment from blowing your relationship apart.
Reconceptualizing Marital Conflict: A Relational Perspective by J.A. Ostenson and M. Zhang (2014) in Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34(4), 229-242.
photo credit: Copyright: <a href=’https://www.123rf.com/profile_refat’>refat / 123RF Stock Photo</a>